March 25, 2019

Apple Insisted on ‘Incentive payments’ worth $1bn from Qualcomm For iPhone chip deal

Apple Insisted on ‘Incentive payments’ worth $1bn from Qualcomm For iPhone chip deal

 

 

The Qualcomm and Apple legal battle is still on. On Friday, Qualcomm’s chief executive testified that his company paid Apple a $1-billion ‘incentive payment’ for the privilege of being Apple’s sole chip supplier, not to block rivals from the market. A payment that Apple insisted on.

The payment was part of a 2011 deal to help ease the technical costs of swapping out the iPhone’s then current infineon chip with Qualcomm’s, CEO Steve Mollenkopf testified at a trial with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission

 

While such a payment is common in the industry, the size of it was not, Mollenkopf said.

 

Under the 2011 deal, Qualcomm was named Apple’s sole supplier of modem chips, which help mobile phones connect to wireless data networks, in exchange for which Qualcomm agreed to give Apple a rebate – the exact nature of which has not been disclosed. Apple could choose another supplier but it would lose the rebate, effectively increasing the cost of its chips.

ALSO READ: QUALCOMM ACCUSES APPLE OF THEFT

Antitrust regulators have argued the deal with Apple was part of a pattern of anticompetitive conduct by Qualcomm to preserve its dominance in modem chips and exclude players like Intel.

 

At a federal courthouse in San Jose, California, Mollenkopf testified that Apple demanded the $1 billion without any assurance of how many chips it would buy, which pushed the chip supplier to pursue an exclusivity arrangement in order to ensure it sold enough chips to recover the payment.

 

Qualcomm was not aiming to block rivals like Intel, he said.

 

‘The risk was, what would the volume be? Would we get everything we wanted, given that we paid so much in incentive?’ Mollenkopf testified.

ALSO READ: China Court Bans Sales of iPhone new Models Over Qualcomm Patent Infringement

Earlier in the day, Apple supply chain executive Tony Blevins testified that it was Apple’s practice to pursue at least two suppliers and as many as six for each of the more than 1,000 components in the iPhone.

 

The company stopped trying to place an Intel modem chip in the iPad Mini 2 because losing the rebates on Qualcomm’s chips would have made the overall cost too high, he said.

 

‘They made it very unattractive for us to use another chip supplier,’ Blevins said of the rebates. ‘These rebates were very, very large.’

We think you'd love these too...

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *